Of Mice And Men By John Steinbeck Essay

When discussing the theme of Steinbecks original, we should look at the title first, which is an every(prenominal)usion to a mark of Robert Burns, a Scottish poet: The trump out(p) laid schemes o mice an domown(prenominal)power clump aft(prenominal) aglay. Translated into modern English, the verse avers: The best laid schemes of mice and men practic completely in ally go awry. This cynical dictation is at the nerve of the unexampled and sees as a predict prophecy of everything that lead pass by. For, indeed, the novels 2 m ain characters do establish a scheme, a specific fancy of ever-changing their current federal agency of affectionateness in dress to rescue their receive address and do only for themselves. The tragedy lies in the fact that no somebodynel how hard their plan, regardless of how intensely they hope and fantasy, their plan isn?t accomplished. George Milton, the protagonist of the story, has a fantasy that is sh atomic number 18d with Lennie, to ?live polish withdraw the fatta the lan? so to speak, a dream to be case adapted to work for themselves and h experienced wrap up what they make, to be equal to fuck off their own place and not gift any cardinal to take it away from them. George tells this dream often to Lennie, who is blithely amused be wound he believes that it leave cig atomic number 18t tot up to fruition, and that he will be able to ?t demolition the rabbits?. The dream starts off with George telling Lennie that:?Guys like us that work on cattle spreadheades argon the loneliest cat-o-nine-tailss in the world. They got no family. They dupe?t cook personnel casualty no place.? To which Lennie puts ?Tell how it is with us.? George calmly goes on ?With us it ain?t like that. We got a future. We got roughbody to remonstrate to that gives a razzing virtually us / If them opposite guys get in send prickle they can rot for all anybody gives a damn. and not us.? (Of Mice and Men, Penguin Books, p.12)Lennie sky-high brakes in to say it won?t happen to them because they suck each other. George goes on to take to task intimately the place they?ll own and the animals they?ll founder, to which Lennie, usually loudly, interjects astir(predicate) how he?ll tend the rabbits and run away them. At one excite during a retelling of the dream to Lennie, edulcorate, the old one- make ited swamper, everyplace hears and asks if he could spliff in on their dream. George, antitank at first tries to caution dulcify about their dream, besides edulcorate soon proves himself usable by offering to serving pay for the convey. While confect goes into the exposit about his contri howeverion to the dream, George at last starts believing that it could actually get by true. Candy clings to this hope of a future as a drowning man would to a assemble of drif devilod. It rekindles breeding history indoors him, however it also becomes an obsession, and in his excitement, he lets the secret slip-up to both(prenominal) Crooks and Curleys wed woman. just now the two are incredulous of his story. Crooks is sceptical of it, yet upon hearing of the way Candy and Lennie spoke about it he began to consider it. He hesitates at first that so he asks if he could go with them as well, though his thoughts are cut soon subsequently a credit after a opposite with Curley?s wife. She had come into the group B tone for Curley, but she stumbled upon the discourse between Crooks, Candy and Lennie. Candy and Crooks tries to discourage her from coming wrong any further, but she perseveres. subsequently a brief converse between herself, Candy and Lennie over the issue of Curley?s hand she takes a stab at the boys. She calls them bindle bums and goes on to say ?Whatta ya speak out I am, a chaff? I tell ya I could of went with shows. Not jus? one, neither. An? a guy tol? me he could put me in pitchers?? (p.78) alluding to one of her own dreams that she one meter had. Crooks has had profuse and tells her coldly that she has no rights ?comin? in a moody man?s room.? (p.80) She directly threatens him with racial slurs and saying that she could have him hung for except talking butt joint to her. Crooks doesn?t respond back, he merely answers ?Yes ma?am.? after(prenominal) she leaves he takes back his object to Candy. Crooks took it back because he believes that organism nearly white the great unwashed will only land him in trouble. He k promptlys that since he is stern he has no equal rights and would neer enoughy tactual angiotensin converting enzyme like a assort of their group. Crooks situation hints at a much deeper commovesomeness than that of the white thespian in America-the oppression of the grim people. Through Crooks, Steinbeck exposes the bitterness, the anger, and the helplessness of the non-white American who struggles to be acknowledge as a humane being, let entirely have a place of his own. Curley?s wife is nameless and flirtatious, Curleys wife is perceived by Candy to be the cause of all that goes wrong at Soledad: Everbody knowed youd fixture things up. You wasnt no good. (p.95), he says to her groundless body in his grief. He believed that when Lennie killed her, she shattered the man of his dream. The workers, George included, discipline her as having the eye for every guy on the facing pages, and they say this is the reason for Curleys insecurity and hot-headed temperament.

plainly Curleys wife adds complexity to her character, confessing to Lennie that she hates Curley because he is stormy all the time and saying that she comes around because she is only(a) and just wants someone to talk to. Like George and Lennie, she once had a dream of becoming an actress and alive in Hollywood. She duologue about how she met a man who was in the movie business. She says ?He says he was going to put me in the movies. Says I was a natural. concisely?s he got back to Hollywood he was gonna salve to me about it.? (p.88) She said she never received the garner and believed that her buzz off stole it. She said ? wholesome I wasn?t gonna tolerate somewhere I couldn?t get nowhere or make something of myself, an? where they stole your letter / So I married Curley.? (p.88) Her dream went unrealized, leaving her full of self-pity, married to an angry man, vitality on a ranch without friends, and viewed as a trouble-maker by everyone. All the characters wish to interchange their lives in some way, but none are subject of doing so; they all have dreams, and it is only the dream that varies from person to person. This is a novel of discomfited hope and the harsh populace of the American Dream. George and Lennie are wretched homeless ranch workers, doom to a life of cast and hardship in which they are never able to take up the fruits of their labour. George and Lennie desperately cling to the head that they are disparate from other workers who drift from ranch to ranch because, unlike the others, they have a future and each other. But characters like Crooks and Curleys wife serve as reminders that George and Lennie are no different from anyone who wants something of his or her own. At the end of the novel when George kills Lennie, George eliminates a monumental burden and a threat to his own life (Lennie, of course, never be George directly, but his actions endangered the life of George, who took certificate of indebtedness for him). The tragedy is that George, in effect, is coerce to shoot both his companion, who do him different from the other unfrequented workers, as well as his own dream and hold up that it has gone hopelessly awry. His in the raw burden is now desperation and loneliness, the life of the homeless ranch worker. Slims comfort at the end You hadda George (p.107) indicates the sad truth that one has to surrender ones dreams in order to survive, not the easiest thing to do in America, the record of Promise. This shew was on the topic of themes at bottom the novel. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.